logologologo
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Approach and Specialties
    • Community Service
    • Awards and Recognition
    • History
    • Contact Us
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • Defense of Criminal Investigations and Proceedings
    • Professional License Defense
    • Teacher Credential Defense
    • Medical Staff Privileges
    • Defense of Consumer Protection and Environmental Investigations
  • OUR PROFESSIONALS
    • Shannon V. Baker
    • Steven B. Plesser
    • Amit Singh
    • Robert J. Sullivan
    • M. Bradley Wishek
    • Alicia Hughes Richardson, Paralegal
  • CONTACT US

Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Filter by Custom Post Type

logologologo
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Approach and Specialties
    • Community Service
    • Awards and Recognition
    • History
    • Contact Us
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • Defense of Criminal Investigations and Proceedings
    • Professional License Defense
    • Teacher Credential Defense
    • Medical Staff Privileges
    • Defense of Consumer Protection and Environmental Investigations
  • OUR PROFESSIONALS
    • Shannon V. Baker
    • Steven B. Plesser
    • Amit Singh
    • Robert J. Sullivan
    • M. Bradley Wishek
    • Alicia Hughes Richardson, Paralegal
  • CONTACT US
logologologo
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Approach and Specialties
    • Community Service
    • Awards and Recognition
    • History
    • Contact Us
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • Defense of Criminal Investigations and Proceedings
    • Professional License Defense
    • Teacher Credential Defense
    • Medical Staff Privileges
    • Defense of Consumer Protection and Environmental Investigations
  • OUR PROFESSIONALS
    • Shannon V. Baker
    • Steven B. Plesser
    • Amit Singh
    • Robert J. Sullivan
    • M. Bradley Wishek
    • Alicia Hughes Richardson, Paralegal
  • CONTACT US
logologologo
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Approach and Specialties
    • Community Service
    • Awards and Recognition
    • History
    • Contact Us
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • Defense of Criminal Investigations and Proceedings
    • Professional License Defense
    • Teacher Credential Defense
    • Medical Staff Privileges
    • Defense of Consumer Protection and Environmental Investigations
  • OUR PROFESSIONALS
    • Shannon V. Baker
    • Steven B. Plesser
    • Amit Singh
    • Robert J. Sullivan
    • M. Bradley Wishek
    • Alicia Hughes Richardson, Paralegal
  • CONTACT US

Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Filter by Custom Post Type

  • ABOUT US
    • Our Approach and Specialties
    • Community Service
    • Awards and Recognition
    • History
    • Contact Us
  • PRACTICE AREAS
    • Defense of Criminal Investigations and Proceedings
    • Professional License Defense
    • Teacher Credential Defense
    • Medical Staff Privileges
    • Defense of Consumer Protection and Environmental Investigations
  • OUR PROFESSIONALS
    • Shannon V. Baker
    • Steven B. Plesser
    • Amit Singh
    • Robert J. Sullivan
    • M. Bradley Wishek
    • Alicia Hughes Richardson, Paralegal
  • CONTACT US

Practice Areas

Peer Review Proceedings

Peer review, when fairly conducted, is calculated to ensure the highest standards of medical practice. As the California legislature has recognized in the law establishing peer review in California, when it is not conducted fairly it results in harm to patients and to healing arts practitioners by limiting access to care. The California Supreme Court has recognized that an adverse outcome in peer review proceedings can have the effect of ending a physician’s career.

Physicians are entitled to certain minimum requisites of fair process in peer review proceedings as established by statute. Medical staff bylaws may provide for greater fairness in the process, but cannot contravene the legislative protections. The process is usually set forth in detail in the medical staff bylaws.

All too often, peer review investigations follow a breakdown in effective communication or professional relationships, whether with colleagues or hospital employees. This can lead to unwarranted accusations of inappropriate or unprofessional conduct or departures from the standard of care even where there are no adverse patient outcomes. Once the medical staff leaders see a pattern of such reports about a physician, it can become difficult to fairly and objectively evaluate the reports.

While every case is different, a physician should generally engage counsel at the earliest possible time if they are the subject of a peer review investigation. Physicians are not permitted by most medical staff bylaws to be accompanied by counsel in any meetings with the medical staff during a peer review investigation. However, counsel can be of tremendous assistance to a physician during a peer review investigation. Counsel can communicate with the medical staff’s counsel, assist the physician in developing evidence for presentation to the medical staff, and can assist a physician in preparing to meet with the medical staff during the investigation to ensure an effective response. In some cases, counsel can recommend remedial measures that a physician can take to address legitimate medical staff concerns.

Adverse actions, including summary suspensions, will result in reports to the California Medical Board and the National Practitioner Data Bank and can lead to a separate Medical Board investigation.

Rothschild Wishek + Sands LLP has the experience to assist a physician in effectively responding to a medical staff investigation or in review of an adverse action.

Return to: Practice Areas

Contact Us

765 University Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825

Phone: (916) 444-9845
Fax: (916) 640-0027

Practice Areas

  • Defense of Criminal Investigations and Proceedings
  • Professional License Defense
  • Teacher Credential Defense
  • Medical Staff Privileges
  • Defense of Consumer Protection and Environmental Investigations

© 2023 Rothschild Wishek + Sands LLP.  All Rights Reserved.       Home   |   Privacy Policy   |   Disclaimer

Website design by NetPilot Web Solutions